Monday , June 14 2021

This is DA against Ramaphosa, as the Cabinet change battle struck ConCourt



Although the case was withdrawn after Gordhhan was re-appointed to a cabinet with Ramaphos, the court ruled that the president had published reports of the disputed decision.

When Ramaphos was elected, he decided to take up the fight in the Supreme Court of Appeal. Now in the Constitutional Court, he claims that this decision will lead to a future intervention by the judiciary in enforcement decisions.

In her statement, Ramaphos argues that the "freezing effect" of the Constitutional Court, which does not appeal the lower court's decision, would be that it would be "binding in relation to all enforcement decisions."

In their chapters, the defendant's argument claims that the High Court did not violate the doctrine of separation of powers.

"Having been recognized, as it was, that dismissal decisions are challenged in the context of legality control, including on the basis of irrationality, it is difficult to see how it can be seriously argued that the president should not give reasons. How else can the parties and the courts judge the rationality of the relevant decisions? "AI must argue before the Supreme Court.

While the Presidency says in its arguments that there are no records of a decision to restructure the executive, the prosecution has broken it.

The hearing is expected to be held at 10 am in the morning.


Source link