The city of Kingston, Ontario, is still shaken after a young man is charged with terrorism-related crimes after thousands of hours of investigation by multiple police agencies and two-house attacks.
Here's what we know (and much of what we do not) about the case.
Why is the young man actually accused?
The police have brought two charges against the young person who is accused of deliberately facilitating terrorist activity and advising another person to "deliver, put, throw or blow explosive or other lethal device … against a public purpose site. to cause death or serious bodily injury. "
"I'm curious about what they were not burdened with [the youth] with Leia West, who practices the National Security Act and previously worked in the Litigation and Consultation Group on National Security at the Justice Ministry, told CBC Radio The house.
"They did not blame him in S. 83.2, which requires proof of belonging to a terrorist group. Since there is no reference to a terrorist group, this may tell me that maybe they do not think he is connected to a group such as ISIS. or believe that it can be self-radicalized or self-inspired. "
What does the alleged plot mean?
At a press conference on Friday, the RCMP said he had received a "truer" advice from the US Federal Bureau of Investigation in late December 2018 that there were people in Kingston planning a terrorist attack that led to police attacks in two homes in a Thursday zone.
An investigative source told CBC News that the alleged terrorist activity includes a plan to use an explosive device, but a specific target has not yet been selected.
Watch: Security experts are discussing the Kingston investigation
The source said that the person or persons involved intended to have the potential to create an improvised explosive device and to formulate a plan, but the arrests came before the target was chosen, the source said.
"There is no specific goal, but there was a planned attack," said RCMP Director Peter Lambertuchi.
After the RCMP arrests, they found "elements" and "trace elements" from improvised improvised explosive devices in undetermined locations. The explosive was later neutralized, Lambertchi said.
What do we know about the suspect?
The identity of the accused is detained by the police, as the person is a minor and is protected under the Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Due to this publication ban, little can be reported about who the suspect is. Details about their family, which can reveal the subject's identity, are also protected.
The person will return to court on Monday.
A second man, an elderly man, CBC News has been identified as Hussam Eddin Alzahabi, also arrested on Thursday but not charged.
Police describe the relationship between Husam Eddin Alzahabi and the accused as "informal friendship."
Husam's lawyer, Mohammed El Rashidi, told TBS that his client would remain innocent and continue to cooperate with the security services during the investigation.
"He exercises his legal rights and takes care of Canada's safety as much as the next person," said El Rashidi. "He is here, he teaches, he does everything to be able to contribute to society, and has no reason to tame him or to treat him differently than anyone else."
Can there be more charges?
Former CSIS senior analyst Jessica Davis said she would not be surprised if more charges were filed against others while the investigation was ongoing.
"What we know about terrorism in Canada is that people rarely act alone," she said Power and politics.
"They usually have people who receive material or financial support or encouragement."
What was the motivation?
Despite repeated questions during Friday's press conference, the police will not comment on the ideological motives of people detained or saying they have any links with foreign elements.
Davis said that in order to impose the terrorist charge, officials should have a clear ideological link, so the police would probably be silent because it concerns a continuing investigation.
"The individual should be motivated by political, religious ideological considerations to know what that is," she said.
"Whatever the motive, it can divert other people.
Some of these details could occur when the case goes to court and the Crown has to dispute its case.
Was Kingston ever at risk?
While the attack is considered inevitable, officials say there was no serious threat to the Kingston people.
"I want to assure the citizens of Kingston, Ontario, the area, and all Canadians that during our investigation our main focus was on safety and public protection," said Michael Lesage, RCMP's chief overseer. Division.
Public Security Minister Ralph Guale said the operation has not changed the level of threat in the country. It remains "average", moving from the end of 2014.
"The feeling for number one is that people are reassured, they think law enforcement have done a good job and are at the top of the situation," added Mayor Brian Patterson.
Why is FINTRAC included?
The RCMP said they were supported by Kingston Police and FBI staff with the support of the Ontario Provincial Police, the Canadian Border Services Agency, the Canadian Intelligence Service, and the FINTRAC Center for the Analysis of Financial Transactions and Accounts of Canada.
The last agency stood out before some national security observers.
As a Canadian Financial Intelligence Wing, FINTRAC's work is to detect, prevent and attempt to stop money laundering and terrorist financing.
It is not clear at this time what role they play.
"The only reason I have come up with will be if I transfer money to an area that has been tagged or receiving money that has been marked by an area that matters to FINTRAC or the banks," West said.
West also pointed out that the CBSA calls this probe as interesting, but it is unclear what role they play.
Again, more details about the scope of the investigation are likely to appear in court, as both sides build their arguments.