Wednesday , January 20 2021

Huawei: why the United States considers the Chinese technology giant a threat to national security



Meng Wanzhou, chief financial officer of the company, was arrested in Vancouver on December 1. Detachment details have not been released, but the US is investigating Huawei for a possible violation of sanctions against Iran.

Men's arrest in Meng Wanghu, the daughter of founder of China's telecom giant Huawei and the finance director of the company, provoked a political storm between Washington and Beijing.

Although charges against Wanzhou were not originally reported, we learned that the arrest was made at the request of the United States, which believes the company has violated the sanctions against Iran.

China has demanded the immediate release of the executive and called the detention "human rights violation".

Huawei, which accounts for 15 percent of the global market, is the world's second-largest mobile phone maker, is banned in several Western countries because they fear Beijing will force the company to reveal industrial secrets, and another confidential information which would jeopardize national security.

Countries like the United States, New Zealand and Australia blocked the giant for security reasons. While others like Canada, Germany, Japan and South Korea have put the company under evaluation.

For his part, Huawei defends his independence, denies the allegations and insists he is a private company.

Is Huawei a threat to national security?

The United States argued that Huawei poses a risk to national security.

And Washington explains this end for links of its founder to the army (Ren Zengfay is a former Chinese Liberation Army officer) and because of the growing importance it has gained worldwide,

Huawei has grown rapidly in the equipment market, making cellular networks work. At the moment it is the largest telecommunication equipment provider in the world,

Just as China occupies an increasingly important place on the world stage, the same is happening with the technological giant.

Theoretically, technology control, which is at the heart of the most important communications networks, gives the company the ability to spy on or interfere communications in any possible conflict, especially in the context where more and more products work through the internet.

The United States is particularly concerned about the rule approved in 2017 by China's National Intelligence Agency, according to which companies should "support, cooperate, and cooperate with national intelligence."

Following the approval of this Regulation, USA, Australia and New Zealand prohibiting local firms from using Huawei to provide the technology that allows the use of 5G networks,

There are three members of the group who share intelligence information called "5 eyes"The fourth party in the group is Canada, which is currently reviewing its relationship with the company.

Until now, the UK has not made any determination against the company, even though it has asked her to repair problems that are "new risks" for the network.

What does Huawei say?

The company is represented as a private company whose owners are its employees and which has no ties to the Chinese government except their tax liabilities.

Huawei says one of his priorities is the security of products and that part of the hostility he has suffered is due to the fact that the company is considered commercial threat.

In the past, the Chinese government itself has announced that the blocking of Huawei's products is due to "protectionist and discriminatory practices".

The new episode of hostility against the company comes as a result of the trade war between Washington and Beijing, with President Donald Trump accusing China of unfair business practices and facilitating theft of intellectual property for US companies.

On the other hand, as several countries plan to introduce 5G communications networks at the same time, the scenario has become more competitive for companies trying to win contracts.

"There is a war on norms" behind the scenes, says Emily Taylor of the British Learning Center House Chatam,

"I think the commercial advantage of defining standards that benefit local technology providers is also something that is on the table."


Source link