Thursday , June 24 2021

Massy University Press Professor Grant Hannis has been convicted of an offensive assault at a rest home

A university academician who has improperly attacked a 82-year-old woman with dementia in a rest home if his conviction is abridged because he was publicly titled.

Former 55-year-old Massey University's journalist professor struggles to keep his name permanently suppressed to claim that it will cause him the ultimate difficulties.

He lost his oppression when he appeared at the Wellington County Court yesterday to be convicted of what Judge Stephen Harop described earlier as "incredibly insulting."

The suppression rose at midnight.

Judge Harop, when sentencing, took into consideration Hanis's previous good character, his contribution to the community and his remorse, and the decision to abolish suppression.

"There must be a discount to recognize the effect of the publication on you as a form of punishment," he said.

He was sentenced to eight months home arrest, 100 hours of work in the community and ordered to pay compensation for emotional damage of $ 3,000.

Hannis was sitting in the dock with his eyes closed for most of the hearing. His wife sat in the public gallery head down, sometimes putting her face in one hand.

He initially claimed that the offender was "two friends who just had an intimate moment together," but at the end of last year they were found guilty of an offensive assault.

Hannis continues to teach for six months after his arrest. The university said he had never been told about his arrest or the charges he faced.

The victim, "slowly moving away" and becoming more confused and injured after the attack, was at home in the Lower North Island in May 2018, when Hannis approached her and began a conversation.

Hannis was at home with a relative.

According to the police summary, when the victim returned to her bedroom, Hannis followed her and closed the door behind her.

Hannis began touching and kissing the woman who was trying to repel him unsuccessfully, but he was "too strong," according to the abstract.

Then he closed the curtains so that no one could see them inside before returning to the victim to continue kissing her and touching her.

"At that moment, the door opened and a nurse came in and saw the couple be in the dark. The owner turned on the light, "the summary said.

The educator noticed that Hannis was red in his face and asked what was going on. When nobody answered, she went to find a manager.

Despite the invasion, he soon began to kiss and touch the victim, who again tried to repel him.

He exposed himself to the victim before removing the trousers and underwear.

A little later he left.

Grant Hannis spent most of his time in the harbor, his eyes closed, his head bent, sometimes hunched or rocked in his seat. Photo / Melissa Slavey
Grant Hannis spent most of his time in the harbor, his eyes closed, his head bent, sometimes hunched or rocked in his seat. Photo / Melissa Slavey

The educator returned with a nurse and found the victim alone, leaving the bathroom, wearing different trousers.

Her underwear was found in the bin with blood on them.

The victim told the police that she had not told anyone for several days because she was ashamed.

– I just want to forget everything.

The woman's daughter described how the "sparkling spark" in her mother's eyes is already dull.

"Our mother, as she was, slowly moved away," said the daughter.

In court, Hannis said he deeply regrets his actions and said he was "mentally ill" at the time.

"My actions were completely unusual and shook me."

He admitted that he had done wrong and apologized to the victim, his wife, the rest house staff, the friends, the colleagues and the students.

"I just want to forget everything"

A transcript of the victim's police interview shows that she is trying to describe what has happened, and often stops saying, "Oh, God, it's terrible."

The woman calls Hannis "a very strong man," saying he "will not stop".

– I just want to forget everything.

In her own interview she said she was ashamed, so she did not tell anyone about the attack for several days.

The victim has vascular dementia after a stroke in 2014 and has limited mobility in one hand.

In a victim's statement, the woman's daughter describes how the "light spark" in her mother's eyes is already dull and how "sadness enveloped her body" the first time I saw her after the attack.

"I kept her while she was sobbing again and again.

The victim began to have more falls, the heaviest, leaving her unable to move without a wheelchair.

"Our mother, as she was, slowly moved away," said the daughter.

"The accused has made a choice, a choice to take advantage of a good, caring and vulnerable woman." Our mother became part of the movement.

In Hanis' demonstration interviews, he initially denies sexual contact with the victim.

When she faces the charge of sexual violence and the information that blood has been found in the victim's underwear, he suggested "maybe she did it for herself."

Later he admitted that the interaction was consensual and that the victim had used it.

Hannis calls himself and the victim as "personal lovers" and talks about their "little secret".

"I would not attack anyone if she felt threatened that I wanted to say something … I would probably regret it for the rest of my life," he said.

"I was mentally ill when I was insulted

Hannis read a statement in court saying he deeply regretted his actions and said their influence on him was deep.

He apologized to the victim and said he had made a mistake.

"I also apologize to my victim's family. I'm sorry for the pain and pain I've caused you. You have to assume that your mother will be left at peace in the rest home.

He also apologized to his wife and staff at the holiday home, as well as to his friends, colleagues and students.

"You will be terrified and terrified to learn about my actions," he said.

– I was mentally ill when I was offended. The pressure of congestion and the care of my mother have been reflected. My actions were completely atypical and shook me.

He said he voluntarily requested counseling and medication after his arrest.

"The advice I received helped me to understand why I behaved as I did it and to make sure I did not behave again like this.

"I never want to cause such pain and suffering anymore. I will give everyone my absolute confidence: I will never do it again.

The crime "unbelievable," says a judge

Last year, Judge Stephen Harop said the judge was "unbelievable."

"It's hard to understand and rationalize, and that's really a bit untypical."

Judge Harpop has accepted a conviction for two years and nine months in prison, allowing for concessions on factors such as Hanis' accusation of guilt, remorse, his previous contribution to the community, and the decision to abolish name suppression.

Taking these factors into account, Judge Harpop pronounced a verdict of eight months of home arrest and 100 hours of public work, and ordered him to pay $ 3,000 in damages for emotional harm.

Hannis, who was supported by her wife in court, was sitting on the dock with her eyes closed for most of her hearing, sometimes hugging her shoulders forward and swaying slightly.

His wife sat in the public gallery head down, sometimes putting her face in one hand.

The sentence is abbreviated due to the "punishment" of the name

Yesterday, Judge Harrop cut down Hanis's sentence to take account of the fact that the suppression of the name was canceled.

"There must be a concession to recognize the effect of the publication on you as a form of punishment," the judge said in today's verdict.

He took into account the concession with other mitigating features, like Hannes's previous good character, his contribution to the community, and his remorse.

The law professor at Auckland University, Hodge, said there was nothing in the Sentencing Act to suggest that abolishing name suppression should guarantee a rebate.

"The court has to take into account different things," Hodge said, quoting Article 9 (2) of the Act, which lists the mitigating factors that the judge should take into account when the sentence is settled.

Among them are the age of the offender, their repentance, their application and their involvement in the crime, among other things.

To be called in connection with a crime "will not in itself be mitigating," Hodge said.

The sentencing principles also do not point out the perpetrator of the crime, he said.

While an ordinary person may think he is referred to as humiliating and punishable, it is a normal consequence of the trial.

"I do not think I've heard the phrase," if we stop the suppression of names or if we allow it to be published, we will accept it as a further punishment and reduce the other penalties that I would impose. "

"Certainly the judges can think of it. I have not heard this, expressed as if it is part of the legal mix.

– Additional reporting by Kirsty Johnston

Where to get help:

• If it is urgent and you think that you or someone else is at risk, call 111. t
• If you have ever had sexual abuse or abuse and you have to talk to someone, call the Safe to Talk privacy hotline at: 0800 044 334 or 4334 text.
• Alternatively, contact the local police station
• If you have been abused, remember that this is not your fault.

Source link