[ad_1]
Will State Councilors veto a law regulating the financing of private schools? Importers believe that the law does not follow the decision of the Constitutional Court, as it introduces differences between the programs of state and private schools. The National Assembly adopted the law with 42 votes in favor and 36 against.
A proposal for a postponed veto on the amendment to the Law on the Organization and Financing of Education was introduced by a group of state councilors with the first Bogomir Vnuckz,
On the agenda of the meeting of the National Council is included a proposal for a postponed veto on the amendment to the Real Estate Mediation Act adopted by the National Assembly on Friday. A group of senators who vetoed it believed that novelty was contrary to the Constitution because it entered a free economic initiative and, according to state councilors, was contrary to EU law.
According to the researchers, the law adopted by the National Assembly on Wednesday is incompatible with the Constitutional Court's decision, as it introduces a distinction between publicly valid programs and those that have acquired public significance. The introduction of differentiation according to their statements actually justifies distinguishing or limiting the amount of co-financing of the elementary school program of private schools, which is in direct contradiction with the Constitutional Court's decision.
Parliament adopted a draft law on the implementation of the constitutional decision to finance private primary schools with 42 votes in favor and 36 against. She was supported by LMŠ, SD, DeSUS and SAB, minority MP and Left, SMC was abstained. UDF, NSi and SNS were against. If the VC vote is vetoed, 46 votes will be needed for the success of the law, but so far it does not appear, as the parties do not intend to change their positions as they have predicted.
Source link